Intravenous Immune Globulin denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 41 published external-review cases involving Intravenous Immune Globulinand overturned the plan’s denial in 34.1%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
41
2004–2026
Overturned
34.1%
14 denials reversed

Conditions behind Intravenous Immune Globulin denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy6
83.3%
Multiple Sclerosis5
20%

What the insurer actually argued

Denials fall into different categories, and they don’t succeed equally — so the reason on your letter changes how you should answer it.
Reason givenDecisionsOverturned
Medical Necessity
The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable.
31
41.9%
Experimental/Investigational
The plan called the treatment unproven. These turn on published evidence, so the appeal is a literature argument.
10
10%
Typical time to a decision
8 days
Most land between 6 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
53.7%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for intravenous immune globulin 2 g/kg initial dose, and then 1 g/kg monthly. Findings: The physician reviewer found that Wynford-Thomas and colleagues describe myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody associated disease as an inflammatory demyelinating condition of the central nervous system characterized by a monophasic or relapsing course of neurological dysfunction, which does not meet the typical criteria for multiple sclerosis or other known neuroinflammatory conditions and occurs in the presence of serum MOG antibodies detected using specific cell-based assays, with a relapsing course reported in 44% to 83% of patients that more commonly involves the optic nerve.
Medical Necessity · 2022 · IMR MN22-37098
Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A patient has requested authorization and coverage for intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) infusion, Gammagard. Based on the records, this patient has been diagnosed with necrotizing autoimmune myopathy and has been receiving monthly IVIG in combination with methotrexate and low-dose prednisone. Clinical documentation demonstrates normalization and stabilization of the patient’s creatine kinase (CK) and transaminase levels, with continued clinical stability and no evidence of relapse while maintained on this regimen. The patient’s CK and inflammatory markers remain within normal limits. This objective biochemical response supports treatment efficacy.
Medical Necessity · 2026 · IMR MN26-46875

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Physician 1The patient is a 40-year-old woman who achieved pregnancy through in vitro fertilization. She has a history of polycystic ovary syndrome. The patient has an elevated antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer of 2.3 and is on progesterone. There is an apparent history of miscarriage; however, there are no details regarding the number of miscarriages, at what gestational age, and whether there were previous successful pregnancies. A request has been made for intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) therapy. The Health Plan has denied authorization for IVIG therapy on the basis it is considered experimental.IVIG therapy is unproven in the treatment of recurrent miscarriage. It has not yet been shown to be beneficial in randomized, controlled studies. In addition, there is no evidence that this patient’s prior loss is in relation to the autoimmune event.
Experimental/Investigational · 2004 · IMR EI04-3809
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested infusions of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for treatment of the enrollee’s medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that PANDAS (pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections) is a term used for children that have abrupt onset of tics and/or obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms following group A beta hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infection.
Medical Necessity · 2015 · IMR MN15-21293

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Intravenous Immune Globulin, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Intravenous Immune Globulin? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39