Bariatric Roux-en-y denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 63 published external-review cases involving Bariatric Roux-en-yand overturned the plan’s denial in 73%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
63
2005–2017
Overturned
73%
46 denials reversed

Conditions behind Bariatric Roux-en-y denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Hypertension23
78.3%
Musculoskelet Ortho8
62.5%
Cardiac Problem6
83.3%
Mental Hlth Prob5
100%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 19 and 22 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

The patient is a 53-year-old female with a body mass index (BMI) of 56.2 and significant comorbid conditions. Additionally, she has motility and obstructive problems resulting from her gastric stapling over 25 years ago. The patient has completed a psychological evaluation and was deemed an acceptable candidate for weight loss surgery. The Health Plan has denied coverage for revisional gastric bypass surgery based upon their determination that the procedure is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s morbid obesity and gastrointestinal problems.With a BMI of 56.2 and comorbid conditions such as gastric stasis, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, venous insufficiency, and degenerative joint disease the patient meets nationally accepted medical necessity criteria for consideration of weight loss surgery.
Medical Necessity · 2006 · IMR MN06-5552
This patient is a 66-year-old female who is status post vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) with subsequent weight regain. At present, her BMI is 48 and she has obesity related comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and depression. She has had some transient weight loss with diet. Upper GI series and endoscopy suggests that the VBG has broken down. The patient has completed a psychological evaluation and was deemed an appropriate candidate for weight loss surgery. The patient’s provider recommends gastric bypass surgery and has submitted a request for authorization.
Medical Necessity · 2006 · IMR MN06-5619

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
The patient is a 46-year-old female who is 5’1” weighing 240 pounds with a body mass index (BMI) of 45. She has comorbid conditions of hypertension, asthma, and osteoarthritis. She is status post Nissen fundoplication. She has been approved for bariatric surgery on the condition that she loses weight preoperatively and attends support group meetings. She has not complied with these conditions. Based upon the information provided, she has not been evaluated by a bariatric surgeon since 2004. In addition, it is unclear when the patient underwent a psychological evaluation to determine whether she is an appropriate candidate for weight loss surgery.With a BMI of 45 and comorbid conditions the patient meets accepted criteria for consideration of weight loss surgery.
Medical Necessity · 2005 · IMR MN05-4585
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for treatment of the enrollee’s obesity. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the submitted documentation fails to demonstrate the medical necessity of the requested services. Not all patients will be determined to be appropriate candidates for bariatric surgery despite meeting body mass index metrics to meet definition for morbid obesity. Although this patient is an adult with morbid obesity, she was not determined to be an appropriate candidate after completion of a multidisciplinary evaluation at this time. Per the records, she was not found to have obtained psychological clearance. Therefore, the risks of surgery outweigh the potential benefits at this time.
Medical Necessity · 2017 · IMR MN17-26232

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Bariatric Roux-en-y, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Bariatric Roux-en-y? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9