Musculoskelet Ortho denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 86 published external-review cases involving musculoskelet orthoand overturned the plan’s denial in 48.8%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
86
2003–2018
Overturned
48.8%
42 denials reversed

Most-fought treatments for musculoskelet ortho

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Bariatric Lap Band22
36.4%
Bariatric Other21
47.6%
Bariatric Duod Swtch11
81.8%
Bariatric Roux-en-y8
62.5%
Gastric Bypass7
57.1%

What the insurer actually argued

Denials fall into different categories, and they don’t succeed equally — so the reason on your letter changes how you should answer it.
Reason givenDecisionsOverturned
Medical Necessity
The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable.
78
51.3%
Experimental/Investigational
The plan called the treatment unproven. These turn on published evidence, so the appeal is a literature argument.
8
25%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 17 and 22 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for a bariatric surgeon consultation. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested service is not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s morbid obesity. A review of the record indicates that the enrollee has been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type; asthma; alcohol use disorder; hypertension; diabetes; and morbid obesity. A progress note dated 7/27/18, reported the enrollee presented for a psychiatric evaluation for gastric bypass procedure. The provider reported the enrollee had tried multiple diets, diet pills (Hydroxycut), and exercises regularly without losing significant weight. The enrollee denied binge eating and purging.
Medical Necessity · 2018 · IMR MN18-29862
A 28-year-old female has requested a duodenal switch procedure for the treatment of her morbid obesity. Findings: The physician reviewer found that this patient meets generally accepted guidelines for bariatric surgery based on National Institutes of Health criteria. At issue is whether the duodenal switch procedure is medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s morbid obesity as opposed to available surgical alternatives. The duodenal switch procedure is a reasonable and appropriate treatment option for morbid obesity in the well selected candidate. It is a standard primary treatment for morbid obesity, and is approved by the American Colleges of Surgeons, the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Duodenal switch is well-accepted as a safe procedure.
Medical Necessity · 2009 · IMR MN09-10106

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Physician 1: The patient is a 45-year-old female with a body mass index (BMI) of 44. She has multiple comorbidities. She has requested authorization and coverage for laparoscopic restrictive vertical gastroplasty/gastrectomy. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the efficacy of the requested procedure remains unproven.Restrictive vertical gastroplasty/gastrectomy is generally appropriate as a component of a staged procedure in the super obese (BMI greater than 60). As an isolated procedure, there are no large studies to confirm its long-term efficacy. The American Society of Bariatric Surgeons does not recognize restrictive vertical gastroplasty/gastrectomy as an isolated bariatric procedure. Furthermore, the requested procedure does not fall within the Health Plan guidelines of approved bariatric procedures.
Experimental/Investigational · 2006 · IMR EI06-5322
Physician 1: The patient is a 51-year-old female weighing 335 pounds with a body mass index (BMI) of 61. She has a number of comorbid conditions including hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and degenerative joint disease. The patient’s provider has recommended laparoscopic vertical gastroplasty/gastrectomy. The Health Plan has denied coverage for the requested procedure on the basis it is considered investigational.There is more than adequate data regarding the requested procedure. All the published data show a higher failure rate for the requested procedure (greater than 50%) over the life of the operation. In fact, vertical gastroplasty/gastrectomy has a high revision rate compared to other weight loss procedures.
Experimental/Investigational · 2005 · IMR EI05-4460

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving musculoskelet ortho, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Fighting a denial for musculoskelet ortho? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9