Polyneuropathy denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 13 published external-review cases involving polyneuropathyand overturned the plan’s denial in 23.1%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
13
2004–2020
Overturned
23.1%
3 denials reversed

Most-fought treatments for polyneuropathy

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Lyrica5
60%
Typical time to a decision
20 days
Most land between 11 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
30.8%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

A 45-year-old female enrollee has requested for Lyrica for the stated diagnosis of polyneuropathy for treatment of her medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that this patient’s records demonstrate that she has failed treatment with numerous medications. In addition, she has undergone radiofrequency neuromodulation of the sympathetic chain. The patient reports that a trial of Lyrica provided her relief from her neuropathic pain. Although use of Lyrica in the treatment of peripheral neuropathy would be an off-label use of the medication, this patient has tried other treatments without success and she has had a positive response on a trial of the drug. Although officially approved only for diabetic neuropathy, post herpetic neuralgia, and fibromyalgia, many medications are used off-label with successful outcomes.
Medical Necessity · 2010 · IMR MN10-11766
A 52-year-old male enrollee has requested Lyrica for the treatment of his polyneuropathy. Findings: Two physician reviewers found that Lyrica has been beneficial for this patient. Lyrica is medically appropriate for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. Management of neuropathic pain is usually a clinical extension of what is learned in clinical trials with well-studied neuropathy pain, typically diabetic in origin. There is no evidence that non-diabetic neuropathy pain responds differently than pain from diabetic neuropathy. There is evidence that supports the use of Lyrica in cases with non-diabetic neuropathic pain, including postherpetic neuralgia and fibromyalgia. Lyrica should be approved for this patient. He has already failed gabapentin, and he has had successful response to Lyrica.
Medical Necessity · 2008 · IMR MN08-8381

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for Beeks arch support shoes and a Simmons 6th generation bed including Super Plush Pillow Topper.Researchers state that excessive foot pronation during gait is a risk factor in medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS). Researchers studied the effects of bilateral foot orthoses during running on dynamic foot-pressure distribution patterns in recreational runners with MTSS and found that arch-support foot-orthoses may help with conditions such as MTSS. Hsieh and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine the short-term effects of customized arch support insoles on symptomatic flexible flatfoot in children.
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-34505
The patient is a 66-year-old male and has neuropathic symptoms of painful foot and leg tingling. Spinal stenosis has been diagnosed. Lumbar laminectomy has been performed in the past. The patient’s HbA1C was normal, but fasting glucose was elevated. No glucose tolerance test results are cited. A podiatry evaluation for plantar fasciitis resulted in a diagnosis of neuropathic symptoms “apparently from the back.” NSAIDs, Neurontin, physical therapy, and spinal injections were tried without sustained relief. Recently, the patient received a trial of Lyrica. The patient and his provider indicate Lyrica has completely controlled his symptoms. At issue is whether Lyrica is medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition.The patient has symptoms suggesting polyneuropathy. Etiologic diagnosis is unclear.
Medical Necessity · 2006 · IMR MN06-5977

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving polyneuropathy, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Fighting a denial for polyneuropathy? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39