Cirrhosis denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 29 published external-review cases involving cirrhosisand overturned the plan’s denial in 75.9%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
Most-fought treatments for cirrhosis
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for residential treatment center (RTC) services. Per the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) criteria, this patient meets Level 3.5 criteria for RTC services. ASAM criteria focuses on six dimensions to determine the appropriate level of care, which includes: (1) intoxication and withdrawal potential; (2) biomedical conditions; (3) emotional, behavioral and cognitive conditions; (4) readiness to change; (5) relapse, continued use, or continued problem potential; and (6) recovery environment. For dimension 1, the patient was treated for alcohol withdrawal with a Librium taper. The patient has continued to complain of agitation, tremors, and irritability.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested computed tomography angiography (CTA) for evaluation of the enrollee’s end stage liver cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the requested diagnostic procedure has been established as medically necessary for evaluation of the patient’s medical condition. CTA of the chest is a radiologic examination of the structures in the chest that allows the clinician to see highly detailed vascular anatomy. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) recommends coronary angiography prior to liver transplantation when the patient has greater than two risk factors due to increased risk of poor outcomes in the transplanted patient with significant coronary artery disease (Raval, et al).
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for residential treatment center (RTC) services. Per the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) criteria, this patient does not meet Level 3.1 criteria for RTC services. ASAM criteria focuses on six dimensions to determine the appropriate level of care, which includes: (1) intoxication and withdrawal potential; (2) biomedical conditions; (3) emotional, behavioral and cognitive conditions; (4) readiness to change; (5) relapse, continued use, or continued problem potential; and (6) recovery environment. For dimension 1, the patient was treated for withdrawal during hospitalization and the records indicate that he has been able to remain sober. The patient’s withdrawal needs can be safely managed in a Level 3.1 setting.
The patient is a 57-year-old man with hepatitis C genotype 1 and cirrhosis. He has failed treatment with interferon and ribavirin due to side effects including bone marrow and psychiatric effects. He has a long list of complicating diagnoses including hypertension and cholelithiasis. The patient’s provider has recommended the patient begin treatment with ribavirin monotherapy. The Health Plan has denied authorization and coverage for the requested therapy on the basis it is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition.The issue of treatment failure and the benefit of ongoing therapy with interferon or ribavirin as a method to suppress inflammation has been addressed in the published guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving cirrhosis, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY