Chronic Low Back Pain denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 137 published external-review cases involving chronic low back painand overturned the plan’s denial in 32.1%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
Most-fought treatments for chronic low back pain
| Treatment | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
| Intracept Procedure | 32 | 34.4% |
What the insurer actually argued
| Reason given | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
Medical Necessity The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable. | 82 | 25.6% |
Experimental/Investigational The plan called the treatment unproven. These turn on published evidence, so the appeal is a literature argument. | 55 | 41.8% |
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for the Intracept procedure (thermal destruction of intraosseous nerve, inclusive of all imaging guidance, first two vertebral bodies, lumbar or sacral). In a randomized control trial evaluating the effectiveness of intraosseous radiofrequency ablation of the basivertebral nerve to standard treatment of chronic low back pain in a specific subgroup of patients suspected to have vertebrogenic related symptomatology, researchers found clear statistical superiority for all primary and secondary patient-reported outcome measures in the radiofrequency ablation arm compared with the standard care arm. The authors noted statistically significant improvements in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and visual analogue scores (VAS) in the treatment arm compared to the arm receiving standard care.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A male enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for methadone 10 mg five pills per day. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested medication dosage is not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s chronic low back pain.The records indicate that this patient is being treated for chronic non-malignant pain. In terms of the patient’s medications, opioid medication can be considered as part of the standard of care when treating patients with chronic non-malignant pain. Concern for opioid misuse can result in undertreatment of pain and opioids are frequently used because there are few alternative agents that offer the same level of analgesia. The analgesic options for patients with chronic pain have steadily declined.
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for the Intracept procedure at L4-L5 and L5-S1. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves the use of the Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System in conjunction with radiofrequency generators for the ablation of basivertebral nerves of the L3 through S1 vertebrae for the relief of chronic low back pain that has not responded to at least six months of conservative care, and is also accompanied by features consistent with type 1 or type 2 Modic changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as inflammation, edema, vertebral endplate changes, disruption and fissuring of the endplate, vascularized fibrous tissues within the adjacent marrow, hypointensive signals, and changes to the vertebral body marrow including replacement of normal bone marrow by fat, and hyperintensive signal…
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for (1) red light therapy machine for home use, (2) ultrasound machine for home use, and (3) cold therapy unit for home use. There is limited evidence in current medical literature supporting the use of red-light therapy, also referred to as low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Childress and Beutler report regarding the management of chronic tendon injuries, “Other modalities such as prolotherapy, topical nitroglycerin, iontophoresis, phonophoresis, therapeutic ultrasound, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, and low-level laser therapy have less evidence of effectiveness but are reasonable second-line alternatives to surgery for patients who have persistent pain despite appropriate rehabilitative exercise.” However, Baktir and colleagues report regarding the short-term effectiveness of LLLT, “LLLT p…
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving chronic low back pain, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY