Chronic Hepatitis C denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 58 published external-review cases involving chronic hepatitis cand overturned the plan’s denial in 81%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
58
2002–2023
Overturned
81%
47 denials reversed

Most-fought treatments for chronic hepatitis c

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
TreatmentDecisionsOverturned
Mavyret20
95%
Harvoni13
69.2%
Typical time to a decision
14 days
Most land between 12 and 20 days
Handled as urgent
13.8%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm
Recent direction
Rising
71.9%96% overturned, last three years

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Harvoni for treatment of her medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that according to joint guidelines issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), all patients with chronic hepatitis C should be treated except those with limited life expectancy due to non-liver-related conditions. This applies regardless of fibrosis stage or viral load. Harvoni is a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir, a hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A inhibitor, and sofosbuvir, an HCV nucleotide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitor. The drug is FDA-indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection in adults.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-21334
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage of Epclusa 400mg-100mg, once daily for 12 weeks and ribavirin 200 mg three times daily for three weeks. Findings: The physician reviewer found that, according to joint guidelines issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), all patients with chronic hepatitis C should be treated except those with limited life expectancy due to non-liver-related conditions. All patients should be treated, regardless of fibrosis stage. Per the guidelines, cirrhotic patients are high priority for treatment, and Epclusa for 12 weeks is recommended as first-line therapy for treatment naive, genotype 3 patients.
Medical Necessity · 2017 · IMR MN17-24670

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for Technivie (ombitasvir-paritaprevir-ritonavir 12.5 mg/75 mg/50 mg) tablets for 12 weeks. Findings: The physician reviewer found that : According to the most recent joint guidelines issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), all patients with chronic hepatitis C should be treated except those with limited life expectancy due to non-liver-related conditions. This applies regardless of fibrosis stage. The guidelines recommend that treatment naive genotype 4 patients should be treated with Technivie and ribavirin for 12 weeks. However, this is recommended as an alternate regimen rather than first-line therapy.
Medical Necessity · 2017 · IMR MN17-26915
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for Epclusa with ribavirin 400 mg – 100 mg tablet for 24 weeks. Findings: The physician reviewer found that according to joint guidelines issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), all patients with chronic hepatitis C should be treated except those with life expectancy less than 12 months due to non-liver-related conditions. However, the patient has satisfied this recommendation with two treatments, including a failed treatment with Viekira Pak, an NS5A inhibitor.
Medical Necessity · 2017 · IMR MN17-24583

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving chronic hepatitis c, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Fighting a denial for chronic hepatitis c? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9