Zelnorm denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 13 published external-review cases involving Zelnormand overturned the plan’s denial in 53.8%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
13
2003–2007
Overturned
53.8%
7 denials reversed

Conditions behind Zelnorm denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Irritable Bowel Syndrome9
44.4%
Constipation3
66.7%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 18 and 21 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

The patient is a 36-year-old female with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although the patient has responded to therapy with Zelnorm, she quickly relapses once therapy is discontinued. Relapse of her IBS has resulted in painful perianal disease that has required surgery in the past. The Health Plan has denied authorization for Zelnorm therapy on the basis that it is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s IBS.Though it has been suggested that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of Zelnorm for 4-6 weeks with one repeat, the FDA actually suggests that therapy for 12 weeks should be considered in those patients who respond by 4-6 weeks. The FDA approval never discusses repeat dosing. Furthermore, labeled indications for any drug do not necessarily reflect standard of care or prudent use.
Medical Necessity · 2004 · IMR MN04-3865
The patient is a 56-year-old woman with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) who has not responded to traditional therapies for this disorder. The records provided indicate the patient did respond to treatment with an approved therapy, Zelnorm. Since Zelnorm was discontinued the patient’s symptoms have returned. She has requested authorization for further treatment with Zelnorm. The Health Plan has denied this request on the basis that Zelnorm is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition. Although the FDA approval for Zelnorm is limited to several weeks, IBS is a lifelong condition. It appears this patient has tried multiple other alternatives without relief. It also appears the patient has had a positive response to a low dose of Zelnorm.
Medical Necessity · 2004 · IMR MN04-3986

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
This patient is a 28-year-old woman who has irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation dominance. The patient has been taking Zelnorm for several months. The submitted documentation indicates that since the patient has been taking Zelnorm she has had normal bowel habits and no abdominal pain. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dosage for Zelnorm is 6mg twice daily for four to six weeks, which could be extended another four to six weeks depending upon results. The patient wishes to continue treatment with Zelnorm. The Health Plan has denied authorization for Zelnorm on the basis that it is not medically indicated.Although the duration of the patient’s use of Zelnorm has exceeded FDA guidelines, IBS and constipation are lifelong conditions. The patient’s provider has indicated that the patient has not responded to any conventional medications.
Medical Necessity · 2004 · IMR MN04-3668
The patient is a 46-year-old female with a longstanding history of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Zelnorm has relieved her constipation, bloating, and abdominal pain. The patient has requested authorization for a longer duration of Zelnorm therapy. The Health Plan has denied the request on the basis that continuation of Zelnorm is not medically indicated.Although the duration of the patient’s use of Zelnorm has exceeded FDA guidelines, IBS and constipation are lifelong conditions. The patient’s provider has indicated that the patient has not responded to any conventional medications. In addition, it has been noted that the patient’s symptoms returned once Zelnorm was discontinued. In this particular case, given the patient’s clinical condition and her past success with Zelnorm, continued use of Zelnorm may be medically indicated.
Medical Necessity · 2004 · IMR MN04-3657

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Zelnorm, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Zelnorm? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39