Xiaflex denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 17 published external-review cases involving Xiaflexand overturned the plan’s denial in 82.4%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
17
2014–2025
Overturned
82.4%
14 denials reversed

By condition

Published outcomes when Xiaflex was denied for these conditions.
ConditionDecisionsOverturned
Peyronie's Disease17
82.4%

What the insurer actually argued

Denials fall into different categories, and they don’t succeed equally — so the reason on your letter changes how you should answer it.
Reason givenDecisionsOverturned
Medical Necessity
The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable.
14
78.6%
Experimental/Investigational
The plan called the treatment unproven. These turn on published evidence, so the appeal is a literature argument.
3
100%
Typical time to a decision
14 days
Most land between 13 and 19 days
Handled as urgent
5.9%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Xiaflex for treatment of his medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the submitted documentation supports the medical necessity of the requested medication. Peyronie’s disease is caused by scar tissue which forms along the length of the penis in the corpora cavernosa. Depending on the severity of the condition, this can cause penile curvature with erection. The curvature can make intercourse difficult and/or painful for the patient and his partner. Potential treatment options for Peyronie’s disease include surgery, minimally invasive treatment options, and medications. The results for most previously available medications and minimally invasive therapies have been inconsistent or lacked empirical support for effectiveness.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-21671
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee requested Xiaflex for medical treatment of his Peyronie’s disease. Findings: The physician reviewer found that Peyronie’s disease is caused by scar tissue, called plaque, which forms along the length of the penis in the corpora cavernosa. Depending on the severity of the condition, this condition can cause penile curvature with erection. The curvature can make intercourse difficult and/or painful for the patient and his partner. Potential treatments for Peyronie’s disease include surgery, minimally invasive treatment options, and medications. The results for most previously available medications and minimally invasive therapies have been inconsistent or lacked empirical support for effectiveness.
Medical Necessity · 2015 · IMR MN15-20442

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A patient has requested reimbursement for a Xiaflex injection and/or prospective authorization and coverage for two cycles of Xiaflex injections (two injections per cycle). Xiaflex is indicated for the treatment of patients with symptomatic Peyronie’s disease with a palpable plaque and greater than 30 degrees of penile curvature. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends eight total injections of Xiaflex for such patients. In this case, the patient has a history of symptomatic Peyronie’s disease. The patient underwent four cycles (eight injections) with Xiaflex. However, the patient still has significant residual penile curvature of 30 degrees.
Medical Necessity · 2025 · IMR MN25-45583
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Xiaflex for treatment of his Peyronie’s disease. The physician reviewer found that the submitted documentation fails to demonstrate the medical necessity of the requested medication. This patient has been diagnosed with Peyronie’s disease. Intralesional injection therapies for patients with Peyronie’s disease seek to reduce plaque production, contracture, and improve on recurrence rate and progression. However, at this time, the most effective treatment is surgery. While there is data suggesting intralesional injection with Xiaflex may be beneficial, the findings are preliminary and further investigation is necessary to confirm long-term efficacy. As noted in a study by Egui Rojo and colleagues, although Xiaflex has been approved by the U.S.
Medical Necessity · 2015 · IMR MN15-20256

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Xiaflex, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Xiaflex? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39