Home / Treatments / Sofosbuvir

Sofosbuvir denials: what the review data shows

Independent reviewers have decided 16 published cases where an insurer denied Sofosbuvir — and they overturned the insurer 68.8% of the time. A denial for Sofosbuvir is a starting position, not a final answer.

Published decisions
16
2001–2026
Overturned
68.8%
11 denials reversed

Conditions behind sofosbuvir denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Hepatitis C Virus5
100%
Hepatitis C4
75%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 15 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
18.8%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm
What the reviewers wrote
Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Sovaldi and Ribasphere Ribapak for treatment of his hepatitis C virus (HCV). Findings: The physician reviewer found that according to the most recent joint guidelines issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), all patients with chronic hepatitis C should be treated except those with limited life expectancy due to non-liver-related conditions. This applies regardless of fibrosis stage or viral load. AASLD/IDSA provides the following justification for the above treatment recommendation: Sofosbuvir 400 mg daily was combined with weight-based ribavirin (RBV), 1000 mg to 1200 mg, to treat HCV genotype 2 treatment-naive patients across 3 clinical trials: FISSION, POSITRON, and VALENCE.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-22001
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Daklinza, Sovaldi, and weight-based ribavirin for treatment of his hepatitis C virus. Findings: The physician reviewer found that according to the joint guidelines issued by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) for patients with HCV genotype 3 infections with cirrhosis, in whom prior treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin has failed the recommended regimens include two treatment options. Daily daclatasvir (Daklinza) and sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) for 24 with weight-based ribavirin for interferon ineligible patients and daily sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) and weight-based ribavirin plus weekly peginterferon for 12 weeks for interferon ineligible patients.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-21349

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Daklinza to be used in conjunction with Sovaldi for 12 weeks for treatment of his hepatitis C virus (HCV). Findings: The physician reviewer found that according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) “Successful hepatitis C treatment results in sustained virologic response (SVR), which is tantamount to virologic cure, and as such, is expected to benefit nearly all chronically infected persons.” Guidelines further state that “The goal of treatment of HCV-infected persons is to reduce all-cause mortality and liver-related health adverse consequences, including end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma, by the achievement of virologic cure as evidenced by a sustained virologic response.” In this case, the patient has F2 fibrosis,…
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-21739
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Sovaldi and Daklinza for treatment of his hepatitis C virus (HCV). Findings: The physician reviewer found that the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA) guidelines, relative to this patient’s case, state: `Daily daclatasvir (60 mg*) plus sofosbuvir (400 mg) for 12 weeks is a recommended regimen for treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype 3 infection who do not have cirrhosis. Rating: Class I, Level A`. The medical necessity of HCV eradication as per American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA) recommendations exists irrespective of fibrosis score. However, the submitted records reflect illicit drug use.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-22291

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These are outcomes from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel that binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent process, and internal appeals succeed even more often. Cite the outcome record for Sofosbuvirwhen you appeal: reviewers routinely find that denials like yours didn’t hold up.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Sofosbuvir? 68.8% got it reversed.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39