Skilled Nursing Facility denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 157 published external-review cases involving Skilled Nursing Facilityand overturned the plan’s denial in 22.3%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
157
2002–2026
Overturned
22.3%
35 denials reversed

Conditions behind Skilled Nursing Facility denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Stroke6
16.7%
Paraplegia4
25%
Traumatic Brain Injury3
66.7%
Ischemic Stroke3
0%
Typical time to a decision
5 days
Most land between 3 and 16 days
Handled as urgent
66.2%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm
Recent direction
Rising
15.6%20% overturned, last three years

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services, including speech therapy, physical therapy, and occupational therapy. As noted in the medical literature, admission to SNF is appropriate for patients with conditions that require observation, evaluation of treatment plans, and updating of orders by a physician as well as constantly available skilled nursing services. Patients treated in a SNF require skilled nursing services including wound management, tracheostomy care, bowel and bladder training and tube feeding, and administration of intravenous (IV) medications or medications that cannot be self-administered safely.
Medical Necessity · 2023 · IMR MN23-40570
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services and/or acute rehabilitation facility services. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the documentation available for review, it is identified that the patient sustained an incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Additionally, there is report of sensation and strength below the level of injury. The records suggest that the patient has not received bowel and bladder training, pressure relief training as evidenced by a stage 3 ulcer, training with activities of daily living, assistive device assessment and training, family training, or adequate rehabilitation with physical therapy and occupational therapy.
Medical Necessity · 2022 · IMR MN22-38375

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
The enrollee is requesting authorization and coverage, and reimbursement, for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services. The enrollee was admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for the treatment of severe left hip osteoarthritis status post left total hip arthroplasty. The records indicate the enrollee received skilled physical therapy (PT)/occupational therapy (OT) services to enhance functional mobility skills and activities of daily living (ADLs). The enrollee was able to ambulate 35 feet with one rest period using a front wheel walker and requiring minimal assistance. Her physical status was touch down weight bearing. As part of the discharge plan, durable medical equipment, including a walker and home care referral were prescribed. However, the enrollee did not feel safe for home discharge because she was walking on tippy toes only, and could not walk.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-31775
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested reimbursement for skilled nursing facility services from 5/15/21 through 5/22/21.The patient has had recurrent strokes deemed to be cardioembolic in nature, in the setting of chronic atrial fibrillation with high CHADS-VASC score. Each stroke was treated within a short timeframe, with rapid to early restoration of arterial flow, minimizing the extent of damage to the neuronal reservoir, which is the primary determinant of outcomes following stroke according to Alawieh and colleagues. By 5/14/21, the patient had 5-/5 strength on the left side and some mild functional deficits that could be further addressed with rehabilitation in the community setting. Continued stay in a skilled nursing facility in case he had another stroke was not a medical necessity.
Medical Necessity · 2021 · IMR MN21-35641

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Skilled Nursing Facility, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Skilled Nursing Facility? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9