Skill Nsg Vsts denials: what the review data shows
Independent reviewers have decided 90 published cases where an insurer denied Skill Nsg Vsts — and they overturned the insurer 48.9% of the time. A denial for Skill Nsg Vsts is a starting position, not a final answer.
Conditions behind skill nsg vsts denials
| Category | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebral Palsy | 7 | 42.9% |
| ALS | 5 | 60% |
| Chromosomal Anomaly | 3 | 33.3% |
| Myasthenia Gravis | 3 | 0% |
| Epilepsy | 3 | 66.7% |
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The enrollee’s parent has requested authorization and reimbursement for pediatric day health care and private duty nursing/nursing care at home. The record indicates the enrollee is diagnosed with Koolen de Vries Syndrome after genetic testing was done and revealed KANLS1 mutation. The enrollee had been feeding poorly after delivery and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed dysplastic corpus callosum. She spent approximately four weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit prior to discharge home, related to her feeding issues. She subsequently underwent gastrostomy tube placement and takes 40% of nutritional needs by mouth, with the rest being delivered via gastrostomy (G) tube. She has hypotonia, eustachian tube dysfunction, tracheomalacia, reflux, silent aspiration, audio neuropathy and developmental delay.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has a complicated medical history significant for coloboma, heart defects, atresia choanae, growth retardation, genital abnormalities and ear abnormalities (CHARGE). The patient also has profound developmental delays, hearing loss, esophageal reflux, eosinophilic esophagitis, sleep apnea, asthma, depression, and agitation. He has undergone multiple surgeries to deal with the comorbid features of CHARGE. These surgeries include placement of a gastrostomy tube (GT), placement of bilateral myringotomy tubes, and retinal repair of the right eye, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Due to his complicated medical history and developmental delays, several durable medical devices are required.
Where the denial was upheld
Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for private duty nursing services (CPT G0300 – 4320 units, CPT G0162 – 48 units). At issue in this case is whether the requested private duty nursing services (CPT G0300 – 4320 units, CPT G0162 – 48 units) are medically necessary to treat the patient’s condition for any of the following:• to prevent disease, disability, and other health conditions or their progression;• to prolong life;• to promote physical and mental health and efficiency; or• to correct or ameliorate any physical or behavioral conditions.The submitted documentation does not support that the requested services are medically necessary for any of the following reasons: to prevent disease, disability, and other health conditions or their progression; to prolong life;…
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient is a 21-month-old male who has been diagnosed with interstitial 6q deletion. The patient’s caregivers were noted to include his mother, aunt, and grandmother. The provider noted the patient is status post tracheostomy due to a difficult airway and craniofacial anomalies. The patient also has Pierre Robin sequence, absent corpus callosum, cleft palate, and severe dysphagia. The records noted no pneumonias or severe respiratory illness since his last visit. He was noted to be on room air during the day and was on 2.5 liters of oxygen at night. The records noted that the patient required tracheostomy care and suctioning. He presents with global developmental delays and received physical and occupational therapy. The patient received feedings though his gastrostomy tube.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.
These are outcomes from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel that binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent process, and internal appeals succeed even more often. Cite the outcome record for Skill Nsg Vstswhen you appeal: reviewers routinely find that denials like yours didn’t hold up.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY