Sildenafil denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 13 published external-review cases involving Sildenafiland overturned the plan’s denial in 46.2%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
13
2002–2024
Overturned
46.2%
6 denials reversed

Conditions behind Sildenafil denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Erectile Dysfunction7
71.4%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 11 and 23 days
Handled as urgent
15.4%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for sildenafil. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines recommend calcium channel blockers as the first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud’s syndrome. The guidelines also indicate that phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, such as sildenafil, should be used as a second-line therapy for the treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis and severe Raynaud’s syndrome, and/or patients who do not satisfactorily respond to calcium channel blockers. In this case, the patient has a history of limited systemic sclerosis and Raynaud’s syndrome. A review of the record indicates that the patient’s Raynaud’s syndrome was refractory.
Medical Necessity · 2024 · IMR MN24-40752
Nature of Statutory Criteria/ Case Summary: The enrollee is requesting authorization and coverage for the medication, Sildenafil six tablets every thirty days. Findings: The physician reviewer found that according to the record, the enrollee has a history of obesity and erectile dysfunction, testicular hypofunction and sleep apnea. Sildenafil for erectile dysfunction has been prescribed by his current physician for many years. He was seen by his physician and a refill of his sildenafil citrate 100mg tabs was prescribed with instructions to take one half to one tablet, as needed approximately one hour before sexual activity. The medical literature indicates that phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, which include Sildenafil, are considered a first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) because of their safety and efficacy.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-31112

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for sildenafil. One study demonstrated no favorable significance of sildenafil in improving maximal oxygen consumption in patients with Fontan circulation. Although the patient has a condition where elevated pulmonary vascular pressures and resistance are detrimental, there is a lack of a recent diagnostic study for this patient which has demonstrated pulmonary hypertension. In fact, the most recent cardiac catheterization demonstrated normal pulmonary artery pressures. Moreover, the patient is asymptomatic per the provider’s records with normal oxygen saturation on room air.
Experimental/Investigational · 2023 · IMR EI23-39842
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for sildenafil 20 mg tablets taken three times a day for 90 days for a total of 270 tablets. This patient’s records support a diagnosis of limited cutaneous scleroderma associated with CREST syndrome with calcinosis, esophageal dysmotility, telangiectasias and Raynaud’s syndrome, but not systemic sclerosis. The records report that she did not respond to nifedipine and antiplatelet therapy. However, the patient does not have documented pulmonary artery hypertension, for which sildenafil would be indicated. In addition, she has been responsive to current medications and also has not tried and failed other standard therapies such as Prazosin or Cozaar.
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-32451

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Sildenafil, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Sildenafil? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9