RTC Dishcharge denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 12 published external-review cases involving RTC Dishchargeand overturned the plan’s denial in 41.7%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
12
2005–2006
Overturned
41.7%
5 denials reversed

Conditions behind RTC Dishcharge denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Eating Disorder3
66.7%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 21 and 22 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

The patient is a 34-year-old female with a very long-standing history of anorexia, beginning at age 14-15 years of age. There are recurrent episodes of severe caloric restriction along the way. Her eating patterns hampered her completion of medical school and ultimately led to inpatient treatment in 1998. After withdrawal from medical school the patient later attempted business school but, in spite of continued outpatient treatment, she suffered another relapse. When admitted to residential treatment in January 2005, the patient only weighed 91.5 pounds (65% of her ideal body weight) and was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), anorexia nervosa, mood disorder, and avoidant personality disorder. She reported restricting her daily calories to anywhere from 800 to 1,000 calories or simply having stopped eating while in MBA school.
Medical Necessity · 2005 · IMR MN05-5041
The patient is a 16-year-old female with a history of depression, cutting on herself, running away from home, arguing with her parents, drug use, and overdosing on cold medication. She was admitted to residential treatment on 10/18/04 where she remained until 12/3/04. Her diagnoses included major depression, recurrent; polysubstance abuse; and oppositional defiant disorder. She was treated with a variety of psychotherapies as well as Prozac 20mg and Trileptal 300mg and was felt to have benefited a good amount. Her psychiatrist noted on 11/26/04, “no aggressive or impulsive behaviors-denies urge to use drugs-denies suicidal ideation,” and noted her mood as “good with congruent affect.” By 11/30/04, one of her therapists noted the patient as “teary but able to contain emotions.” On 12/1/04, she was noted as “in good mood this morning.
Medical Necessity · 2005 · IMR MN05-4205

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
The patient is a 37-year-old-female who was admitted for inpatient detoxification in November 2005. Her provider indicated she “sometimes” had suicidal ideation, although there was no plan or specific intent. In November 2005 the progress note indicates the patient was “doing well” by self report. No symptoms of withdrawal were documented; she was felt to be “stable” and her vital signs were normal. The patient transferred to residential care in November 2005 and her diagnoses were documented as alcohol and cocaine dependence.In December 2005 there was a “revised” Medical Physician’s Order Sheet noting diagnoses of bulimia nervosa, ADHD, depression, alcohol dependence and cocaine dependence. The patient’s medications were changed from Celexa to Prozac and Topamax, weights were ordered three times per week and there were instructions to encourage five meals per day.
Medical Necessity · 2006 · IMR MN06-5636
The patient is a 14-year-old male with previously diagnosed bipolar disorder, type I, rapid-cycling type, admitted to residential treatment in December 2004 due to perceived escalating problems predominately directed towards his father and sisters. This included a pattern of tantrums at nighttime for up to two weeks followed by normal mood for several days. He also noted depressive episodes, including depressed and irritable mood, loss of interest, disrupted sleep, fatigue, and some suicidal ideations, short of any set plan for such. The patient cited his rage episodes as having begun at four years of age, becoming worse over the last three years, initially limited to home, but having begun to appear at school.
Medical Necessity · 2005 · IMR MN05-4777

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving RTC Dishcharge, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied RTC Dishcharge? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9