Psychotherapy denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 75 published external-review cases involving Psychotherapyand overturned the plan’s denial in 53.3%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
By condition
| Condition | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
| Depression | 22 | 59.1% |
| Major Depressive Disorder | 16 | 31.2% |
What the insurer actually argued
| Reason given | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
Medical Necessity The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable. | 72 | 54.2% |
Urgent Care Expedited reviews, decided in days rather than weeks. | 3 | 33.3% |
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of a patient has requested authorization and coverage for ongoing psychotherapy treatment, every two weeks. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and American Association for Community Psychiatry (AACP) have unified the Child and Adolescent Level of Care Utilization System (CALOCUS) and the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) into a single instrument, the Child and Adolescent Level of Care/Service Intensity Utilization System (CALOCUS-CASII). This instrument is a standardized tool used to determine the intensity of services needed for children and adolescents, 6-18 years of age, presenting with psychiatric, substance use, medical and/or developmental concerns. Using CALOCUS-CASII, providers score patients on a scale of 1-5 using a six-pronged Dimensional Rating System.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of a patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for psychotherapy services. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and American Association for Community Psychiatry (AACP) have unified the Child and Adolescent Level of Care Utilization System (CALOCUS) and the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) into a single instrument, the Child and Adolescent Level of Care/Service Intensity Utilization System (CALOCUS-CASII). This instrument is a standardized tool used to determine the intensity of services needed for children and adolescents, 6-18 years of age, presenting with psychiatric, substance use, medical and/or developmental concerns. Using CALOCUS-CASII, providers score patients on a scale of 1-5 using a six-pronged Dimensional Rating System.
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested reimbursement for psychotherapy services. The patient is variously diagnosed with major depression, recurrent, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), BPAD unspecified, with impulsivity, risky behavior, and paranoid thinking. He also has a reported seizure disorder. By his own report, the patient had abused alcohol but had been sober for several months before receipt of the services at issue. He also reported having strained family relationships and stress at home. Upon referral from a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) therapist to services elsewhere, the therapist wrote that the patient’s OCD had improved, that he had decreased impulsivity, and that he had no suicidal or homicidal ideation.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested twice weekly therapy visits for treatment of the enrollee’s behavioral health condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the medical literature does not define the frequency or duration for the amount of psychotherapy required for each patient. However, it is generally accepted that patients in crisis require more frequent sessions than patients who are stable. The medical literature also supports that in unrestricted therapies, each additional psychotherapy session has a diminished effect. An article by colleagues, they report, “Our findings suggest that, at least in unrestricted therapies, the average rate of change during psychotherapy can be expected to diminish with each additional session irrespective of the length of treatment.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Psychotherapy, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY