Med Surg denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 16 published external-review cases involving Med Surgand overturned the plan’s denial in 43.8%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
16
2007–2024
Overturned
43.8%
7 denials reversed
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 11 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
18.8%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested inpatient hospitalization for treatment of the enrollee’s medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that there is sufficient support for the services at issue in this clinical setting. According to article researchers regarding care of postoperative cystic fibrosis (CF) patients “Postoperative pain management is critically important in the CF patient population. Pain control is especially important in patients with CF to encourage coughing, deep breathing, and minimize pulmonary complications. Patients should have early access to chest physical therapy and early activity and mobilization as well.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-21436
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A female enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Peripheral nerve injury is a serious complication of hip surgery that can adversely affect a patient’s health outcome. Several studies have described the use of electromyography and intraoperative sensory evoked potentials for early warning of nerve injury. In the medical literature, analyzed data collected between 2001 and 2010 from 69 patients who underwent complex hip surgery by a single surgeon using multimodal intraoperative monitoring. The authors reported that in 35% of the procedures, the provider was alerted to a possible lesion to the sciatic or femoral nerve. The authors concluded that intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is effective for alerting the surgeon to the possibility of nerve injury.
Medical Necessity · 2018 · IMR MN18-28026

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) services. LTACH level care is intended for patients who require care that is more medically complex than can be provided at lower levels of care, such as inpatient rehabilitation, or SNF levels of care. LTACH level of care includes provision of chest tubes, extensive wound care, stable cardiac drips, multiple intravenous antibiotics, hemodialysis, prolonged intravenous therapy, total parenteral nutrition, tracheostomy care, ventilator weaning, and frequent imaging and laboratory testing. In general, more than one of these treatments is being provided at the LTACH level of care.
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-33567
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for inpatient medical/surgical treatment. The records provided for review document that this patient’s wound care has required the use of a wound VAC that is changed every three days. He is also receiving three parental antibiotics that will be ongoing until six to eight weeks after the wound closes. He requires skilled physical and occupational therapy for activities of daily living and a Clinitron bed. He is non-weight bearing on the left lower extremity. Documentation shows an improving wound bed without evidence of acute infection or exposed bone. The provider’s progress notes indicate that the patient has been afebrile and hemodynamically stable. He is tolerating oral analgesics and oral nutrition without complications.
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-32638

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Med Surg, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Med Surg? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9