Home / Treatments / Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee denials: what the review data shows

Independent reviewers have decided 34 published cases where an insurer denied Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee — and they overturned the insurer 52.9% of the time. A denial for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee is a starting position, not a final answer.

Published decisions
34
2001–2026
Overturned
52.9%
18 denials reversed

By condition

Published outcomes when Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee was denied for these conditions.
ConditionDecisionsOverturned
Knee Pain15
40%
Typical time to a decision
6 days
Most land between 4 and 14 days
Handled as urgent
61.8%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm
What the reviewers wrote
Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the right knee. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested service is not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s patellar contusion. A review of the record indicates that the enrollee has been diagnosed with acute patellar contusion, right knee. The enrollee was seen on 10/9/18, after slipping and falling directly on the right knee. The provider reported the enrollee previously had an arthroscopy with trimming of a discoid lateral meniscus of the right knee a year ago with good result. The enrollee was seen on 10/23/18, with reported worsening of right knee pain. The provider is recommending MRI of the right knee.
Medical Necessity · 2018 · IMR MN18-29908
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A patient has requested authorization and coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the middle spine and/or right knee. According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria for the evaluation of chronic knee pain, for an adult patient with initial radiographs demonstrating degenerative changes, an MRI may be appropriate as the next imaging examination, if the patient's symptoms are not explained by the radiographic findings. In this case, the patient’s pain persists despite conservative management and were not explained by radiographic findings. Therefore, an MRI is appropriate, and he may be a surgical candidate.
Medical Necessity · 2024 · IMR MN24-41252

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of a patient has requested authorization and coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left knee. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested services are not medically necessary for evaluation of the patient’s left knee patella injury. The submitted documentation does not support the medical necessity of the requested services. Autologous chondrocyte implantation is a technique that was developed in 1994 to treat cartilaginous defects in various joints, including the knee. It has been performed for both the tibiofemoral cartilage and the patellofemoral cartilage. The procedure involves a two-step surgery. Following implantation, there is a period of restricted weight bearing for up to eight weeks.
Medical Necessity · 2018 · IMR MN18-28742
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee.The American College of Radiology guidelines state that MRI is indicated for non-traumatic knee pain when pain is persistent and radiographs are non-diagnostic. It is not indicated before complete physical examination and radiography, or for the following conditions: severe degenerative joint disease, inflammatory arthritis, stress fracture, osteonecrosis, or chronic regional pain syndrome. (American College of Radiology). Matar and colleagues noted, “The management of patients with knee pain is non-operative both for degenerative meniscal tears and degenerative joint disease in its initial stages. Magnetic resonance imaging has little added value in the management of middle-aged and elderly patients with degenerative disease.
Medical Necessity · 2021 · IMR MN21-34939

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These are outcomes from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel that binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent process, and internal appeals succeed even more often. Cite the outcome record for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Kneewhen you appeal: reviewers routinely find that denials like yours didn’t hold up.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee? 52.9% got it reversed.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39