Inpt Discharge denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 83 published external-review cases involving Inpt Dischargeand overturned the plan’s denial in 15.7%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
83
2005–2025
Overturned
15.7%
13 denials reversed

Conditions behind Inpt Discharge denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Stroke CVA14
21.4%
Bone Fracture Break7
0%
Auto Accident6
33.3%
Fracture5
0%
Diabetes4
0%
Cardiac Heart Prob4
25%
Bacterial Infection3
33.3%
Typical time to a decision
5 days
Most land between 3 and 13 days
Handled as urgent
74.7%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement for inpatient skilled nursing facility (SNF) services and physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy services provided at Broadway by the Sea. Functional impairments due to acquired brain insults such as stroke can be severe to profound. One researcher notes that rehabilitation is an important aspect of the continuum of care in strokes, and that successful rehabilitation involves understanding the natural history of stroke recovery and a multidisciplinary approach to identify and treat common poststroke sequelae. A researcher notes that patients may improve spontaneously within the first three months and then more slowly in the coming year.
Medical Necessity · 2021 · IMR MN21-36543
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for skilled nursing facility (SNF) level of care until the enrollee has open heart surgery. In this case, while the records do not document the patient’s disabilities in terms of patient’s ability to live independently or the degree of home support needed, the degree of right hemiparesis, possible dysphagia, visual acuity, exercise tolerance in general, ability to communicate and to manage medical conditions including diabetes preclude a safe discharge into the community. The records note that the patient lives alone and receives disability benefits, indicating that the patient has been disabled for a length of time.
Medical Necessity · 2023 · IMR MN23-39576

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Findings: The physician reviewer found that a patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for continued inpatient level of care services, or in the alternative, acute rehabilitation services.Admission to an inpatient rehabilitation facility is intended to provide intensive rehabilitation therapy in a resource-intensive inpatient hospital environment for patients who have complex nursing and rehabilitation needs and require the medical management of a rehabilitation physician at least three days per week. Patients are expected to benefit from an inpatient stay and an interdisciplinary team approach to the delivery of rehabilitation care. This treatment plan includes ongoing treatment by physical and occupational therapies and speech-language pathology.
Medical Necessity · 2025 · IMR MN25-43748
The enrollee is requesting authorization and coverage, and reimbursement, for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services. The enrollee was admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for the treatment of severe left hip osteoarthritis status post left total hip arthroplasty. The records indicate the enrollee received skilled physical therapy (PT)/occupational therapy (OT) services to enhance functional mobility skills and activities of daily living (ADLs). The enrollee was able to ambulate 35 feet with one rest period using a front wheel walker and requiring minimal assistance. Her physical status was touch down weight bearing. As part of the discharge plan, durable medical equipment, including a walker and home care referral were prescribed. However, the enrollee did not feel safe for home discharge because she was walking on tippy toes only, and could not walk.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-31775

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Inpt Discharge, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Inpt Discharge? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9