Individ Counsel denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 130 published external-review cases involving Individ Counseland overturned the plan’s denial in 66.9%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
Conditions behind Individ Counsel denials
| Category | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
| Depression | 42 | 78.6% |
| Anxiety | 26 | 69.2% |
| Bipolar Disorder | 14 | 92.9% |
| Depression - Severe | 9 | 44.4% |
| ADHD | 8 | 75% |
| PTSD | 6 | 66.7% |
| Obsess Compulsive | 4 | 0% |
| Eating Disorder | 3 | 66.7% |
| Substance Abuse | 3 | 0% |
What the insurer actually argued
| Reason given | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
Medical Necessity The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable. | 126 | 69% |
Urgent Care Expedited reviews, decided in days rather than weeks. | 4 | 0% |
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for weekly therapy that includes eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and American Association of Community Psychiatrists (AACP) have unified the Child and Adolescent Level of Care Utilization System (CALOCUS) and the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) into a single instrument, the Child and Adolescent Level of Care/Service Intensity Utilization System (CALOCUS-CASII). This instrument provides a reliable framework for determining the appropriate level of care for adolescents needing mental health treatment. Using CALOCUS-CASII, providers score patients on a scale of 1-5 using a six-pronged Dimensional Rating System.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient’s parent has requested authorization and coverage for family therapy once per week and/or individual therapy services twice per week, or in the alternative, individual therapy services once per week. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and American Association for Community Psychiatry (AACP) have unified the Child and Adolescent Level of Care Utilization System (CALOCUS) and the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) into a single instrument, the Child and Adolescent Level of Care/Service Intensity Utilization System (CALOCUS-CASII). This instrument is a standardized tool used to determine the intensity of services needed for children and adolescents, 6-18 years of age, presenting with psychiatric, substance use, medical and/or developmental concerns.
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization for residential treatment center (RTC) services (ASAM 3.5) that include treatment for compulsive sexual behaviors with a multidisciplinary team which includes certified sex addition therapists (CSAT). For Dimension 1, In this case, the patient will be going into RTC treatment following prior detoxification. The patient is experiencing or anticipated to imminently experience mild to moderate signs and/or symptoms of intoxication that can be addressed in any level of care as needed and thus does not require a medically managed addiction treatment program for intoxication management.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for daily 1:1 therapies, to include: (1) occupational therapy 2x/week, (2) art therapy 1x/week, and (3) movement therapy 1x/week, in addition to the approved play 2x/week, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) 1x/week, and family therapy 1x/week. Findings: The physician reviewer found that At issue in this case is whether the daily 1:1 therapies, to include: (1) occupational therapy 2x/week, (2) art therapy 1x/week, and (3) movement therapy 1x/week, in addition to the approved play 2x/week, EMDR 1x/week, and family therapy 1x/week are medically necessary to treat the patient’s medical condition as defined in Health and Safety code section 1374.72(a)(3)(A) set forth below.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Individ Counsel, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY