Hydrocodone-acetaminophen denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 29 published external-review cases involving Hydrocodone-acetaminophenand overturned the plan’s denial in 20.7%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
29
2010–2025
Overturned
20.7%
6 denials reversed

Conditions behind Hydrocodone-acetaminophen denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Back Pain3
33.3%
Typical time to a decision
5 days
Most land between 3 and 16 days
Handled as urgent
65.5%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for hydrocodone/acetaminophen 10/325 mg (Norco 90 tablets/30-day supply) and morphine sulfate extended-release tablets (90 tablets/30-day supply). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported, “Nonpharmacologic therapy and nonopioid pharmacologic therapy are preferred for chronic pain. Clinicians should consider opioid therapy only if expected benefits for both pain and function are anticipated to outweigh risks to the patient. If opioids are used, they should be combined with nonpharmacologic therapy and nonopioid pharmacologic therapy, as appropriate.
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-33507
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg (60 tablets per 30 days).Dowell and colleagues state, “Non-pharmacologic therapy and non-opioid pharmacologic therapy are preferred for chronic pain. Clinicians should consider opioid therapy only if expected benefits for both pain and function are anticipated to outweigh risks to the patient. If opioids are used, they should be combined with non-pharmacologic therapy and non-opioid pharmacologic therapy, as appropriate.” The Federation of State Medical Boards guidelines indicate that providers should use “opioid therapy for chronic pain that is not cancer-related, or part of palliative care or end-of-life care, only when non-opioid and non-pharmacological options have not been effective.” The guidelines recommend that providers “maintain opioid dosage a…
Medical Necessity · 2021 · IMR MN21-36129

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A patient has requested authorization and coverage for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco) 10-325 mg, oral tablets, 180 count. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested medication regimen is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s chronic pain. The submitted documentation does not support the medical necessity of the requested medication regimen. Chronic pain that has no hope for a cure can be considered palliative in nature and treatment. The World Health Organization’s stepwise ladder for pain relief is considered the reasonable approach to pain control in the palliative setting. However, in the documentation submitted for review, there is a lack of objective towards treatment goals for pain and function for this patient. Several requirements for opioid prescribing have not been documented.
Medical Necessity · 2018 · IMR MN18-28834
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for the medication Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) 10-325mg tablets, quantity of 120 tablets per month, taken as one (1) tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed.Standard therapy for rheumatoid arthritis/psoriatic arthritis includes the use of biologic drugs and DMARDs which are immunosuppressive therapies and carry the risk for infection. Due to a history of the left knee prosthetic joint infection, the patient has chosen to avoid biologic drugs and other DMARDs and is currently on hydrocodone-acetaminophen, which is an opiate, a controlled substance, to control chronic joint pain.Opioid pain medication use presents serious risks, including overdose and opioid use disorder.
Medical Necessity · 2022 · IMR MN22-37097

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Hydrocodone-acetaminophen, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Hydrocodone-acetaminophen? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9