Gene Panel Testing denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 19 published external-review cases involving Gene Panel Testingand overturned the plan’s denial in 52.6%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
19
2016–2022
Overturned
52.6%
10 denials reversed

Conditions behind Gene Panel Testing denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Pregnancy3
66.7%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 19 and 24 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested reimbursement for the gene panel testing for evaluation of the enrollee’s astrocytoma. Findings: Two physician reviewers found that the testing at issue was likely to be more beneficial for evaluation of the patient’s medical condition than any available standard therapy. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is an inherited autosomal dominant disorder that is manifested by a wide range of malignancies that appear at an unusually early age. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is also known as the sarcoma, breast, leukemia, and adrenal gland (SBLA) cancer syndrome. This cancer predisposition syndrome is inherited as an autosomal dominant disorder and is associated with abnormalities in the tumor protein p53 gene (TP53).
Experimental/Investigational · 2017 · IMR EI17-26760
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested reimbursement for gene panel testing. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has issued recommendations for expanded carrier screening for genetic disorders in all women before and during pregnancy. The ACOG guidelines recommend that each healthcare provider should establish a standard approach for ethnic-specific, panethnic, or expanded carrier screening. Women should be screened for common conditions such as spinal muscular atrophy, cystic fibrosis, hemoglobinopathies and fragile X. The guidelines also recommend expanded carrier screening, which tests for as many as several hundred conditions simultaneously, as an acceptable strategy for prenatal carrier screening.
Experimental/Investigational · 2018 · IMR EI18-29597

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested reimbursement for gene panel testing and/or the advanced lipoprotein testing. Lipoprotein(a) is a causal independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events has been shown to increase linearly with lipoprotein(a) concentrations. The National Lipid Association (NLA) stated that lipoprotein(a) testing may be reasonable to refine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults with specific risk factors. Per the NLA, a personal history of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, primary severe hypercholesterolemia, or suspected familial hypercholesterolemia, or for patients with first-degree relatives with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Experimental/Investigational · 2022 · IMR EI22-37719
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee’s parent has requested authorization and coverage for gene panel testing (CPT 81405), (CPT 81479), (CPT81404), (CPT 81323), (CPT 81402), (CPT 81321), and (CPT 81406). Findings: The physician reviewer found that routine genetic screening is not recommended for all inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, although it should be considered depending on the age of onset and further criteria such as family history, relevant comorbidities, and extraintestinal manifestations. Genomic testing may be especially useful in children with very early-onset (VEO) IBD diagnosed under the age of two. The older the age of disease onset, the less likely a monogenic disorder is to be identified.
Experimental/Investigational · 2021 · IMR EI21-36529

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Gene Panel Testing, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Gene Panel Testing? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39