Facial Laser Hair Removal denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 14 published external-review cases involving Facial Laser Hair Removaland overturned the plan’s denial in 92.9%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
14
2014–2019
Overturned
92.9%
13 denials reversed

By condition

Published outcomes when Facial Laser Hair Removal was denied for these conditions.
ConditionDecisionsOverturned
Gender Dysphoria13
92.3%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 20 and 21 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for facial laser hair removal. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested services are not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s gender dysphoria and are not reconstructive in nature. Findings: The requested services are medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition in this clinical setting. Facial laser hair removal is within accepted standards of practice and clinically appropriate for treatment of gender dysphoria. The patient was born with genetics to grow terminal hair on the face. Excessive facial hair in a female would be considered abnormal and is referred to as hirsutism. Hirsutism is a medical diagnosis where terminal hair grows in female in areas that are normally found in males.
Medical Necessity · 2018 · IMR MN18-27859
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A 29-year-old enrollee has requested facial laser hair removal. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the patient has a history of gender dysphoria and has been treated with cross-gender hormone therapy since 2010. The patient reported that the facial hair limits their ability to be perceived as female and negates their gender identity. The patient’s symptoms of gender dysphoria are reportedly exacerbated when they were mis-gendered due to the presence of facial hair. The patient’s mental health evaluation documents exacerbation of gender dysphoria symptoms due to the presence of facial hair. Guidelines for the medical necessity of facial feminization surgery (FFS) exist in two reviews from World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and the Transgender Law Center.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-30358

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has a medical history of gender dysphoria. A letter from the patient’s representative dated 12/7/18 states that the patient has been taking cross gender hormone therapy since July 2018. The letter reported that the patient’s symptoms of gender dysphoria have manifested with persistent anxiety, depression, agoraphobia, and overall distress. She has met with her medical provider to discuss laser facial hair removal, and the provider determined that facial laser hair removal is appropriate to treat her gender dysphoria. The letter states that the patient’s facial hair severely limits her ability to be perceived as female and thus negates her gender identity. Being constantly mis-gendered due to the presence of facial hair exacerbates her symptoms of gender dysphoria.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-30379

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Facial Laser Hair Removal, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Facial Laser Hair Removal? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39