Facial Feminization Surgery denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 68 published external-review cases involving Facial Feminization Surgeryand overturned the plan’s denial in 83.8%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
68
2014–2026
Overturned
83.8%
57 denials reversed

By condition

Published outcomes when Facial Feminization Surgery was denied for these conditions.
ConditionDecisionsOverturned
Gender Dysphoria67
85.1%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 19 and 27 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for any or all of the following requested facial feminization surgeries (21175 - reconstruction, bifrontal, superior-lateral orbital rims and lower forehead, advancement or alteration (e.g., plagiocephaly, trigonocephaly, brachycephaly), with or without grafts (includes obtaining autografts); 21139 - reduction forehead, contouring and setback of anterior frontal sinus wall; 30420 - rhinoplasty, primary, including major septal repair; 20902 - bone graft, any donor area; major or large 61782 - stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure, cranial, extradural (list separately in addition to code for primary procedure); 21025 - excision of bone (e.g., for osteomyelitis or bone abscess), mandible; 21122 – genioplasty, sliding osteotomies, two or more osteotomies (e.g., wedge excision or…
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-33345
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for facial feminization surgeries: CPT 67900 – 50 repair of brow ptosis; 31599 – unlisted procedure; larynx; CPT 30420 – rhinoplasty, primary; including major; CPT 14060 – adjacent tissue transfer or rearrangement, eyelids, nose, ears and/or lips; CPT 61782 – stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure; cranial, extradural; CPT 15733 – muscle, myocutaneous, or fasciocutaneous flap; head and neck with named vascular pedicle; CPT 15769 – grafting of autologous soft tissue, other, harvested by direct excision; CPT 15774 – grafting of autologous fat harvested by liposuction technique to face, eyelids, mouth, neck, ears, orbits, genitalia, hands, and/or feet; each additional 25 cc injectate, or part thereof; CPT 20902 – bone graft, any donor area; major or large; and CPT 21175 – reconst…
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-33534

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary:An enrollee has requested facial feminization treatment of the enrollee’s gender dysphoria. Based on the entirety of the medical documentation provided for this review, the requested services are not medically necessary and are not reconstructive in nature. The medical literature supports facial feminization surgery which can include forehead remodeling, rhinoplasty, thyroid chondroplasty, and voice alteration procedures for treatment of gender dysphoria. However, the submitted documentation does not support a functional deficit in this patient’s case, for each of the requested services. The photographs show evidence of mild brow ptosis bilaterally, but no evidence of significant brow or lower forehead prominence, mild prominent ears, signs of facial aging of the lower face and neck.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-24249
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A transgender enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for facial feminization surgeries Findings: The physician reviewer found that based on the entirety of the medical documentation provided for this review including review of the photographs, the requested services are not medically necessary and are not reconstructive in nature. The patient is well documented to have gender dysphoria. Thus, facial feminization surgery and tracheal shave surgery can help to approximate a more feminine appearance. However, there should be sufficient documentation that the patient’s current features are abnormal for a female. This has not been adequately documented for this case. There was not a detailed examination documented by the plastic surgeon supporting abnormal features of the patient.
Medical Necessity · 2017 · IMR MN17-27002

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Facial Feminization Surgery, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Facial Feminization Surgery? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39