Early Discharge denials: what the review data shows
Independent reviewers have decided 26 published cases where an insurer denied Early Discharge — and they overturned the insurer 30.8% of the time. A denial for Early Discharge is a starting position, not a final answer.
Conditions behind early discharge denials
| Category | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke CVA | 3 | 0% |
| Brain | 3 | 0% |
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement for psychiatric inpatient hospital services. The American Association of Community Psychiatrists Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS) provides a reliable framework for determining the appropriate level of care for adults needing mental health treatment. Using LOCUS, providers score patients on a scale of 1-5 using a six-pronged Dimensional Rating System. The six dimensions include: (1) risk of harm; (2) functional status; (3) medical, addictive and psychiatric comorbidity; (4) recovery environment (a. stressors and b. supports); (5) treatment and recovery history; and (6) engagement. The composite score is then used to determine the level of care needed. With regard to risk of harm, the records support a score of 4.
Findings: The physician reviewer found that The patient has requested reimbursement for inpatient hospital services. Burst fractures of the spine result from high energy trauma that results in comminution and breaking of the vertebral body into multiple pieces. This type of injury may be associated with neurological complications due to compression of nerves by bone with loss of sensation, lower extremity muscle weakness, and loss of bladder or bowel control, as well as angular spinal deformity and/or injury to stabilizing ligaments, making it an unstable injury requiring surgical stabilization. Based on this patient’s records, the injury was considered stable as the patient was neurologically intact and the injury was found to be structurally stable, with reference to the standing x-rays.
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An female enrollee has requested reimbursement for hospitalization services and prospective authorization and coverage readmission to an acute care hospital to receive the following services: obstetrics and gynecology (ob/gyn) physician while inpatient; nephrologist, while inpatient; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of abdomen and pelvis, while inpatient, and colonoscopy while inpatient; double balloon endoscopy while inpatient, parasite testing while inpatient, and work up for definitive diagnosis while inpatient. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the documentation provided fails to demonstrate the medical necessity for the services at issue.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for all or any long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) - intensive care unit (ICU) services. Barker-Davies and colleagues report that while long-term sequelae of COVID-19 are unknown, evidence from previous novel coronavirus outbreaks demonstrate impaired pulmonary and physical function, reduced quality of life, and emotional distress. The authors further report that rehabilitation of COVID-19 survivors requiring critical care who may develop psychological, physical and cognitive impairments should be tailored to individual patient needs. Barlow and colleagues note that there is currently no widely accepted standard of care in the pharmacologic management of patients with COVID-19.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.
These are outcomes from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel that binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent process, and internal appeals succeed even more often. Cite the outcome record for Early Dischargewhen you appeal: reviewers routinely find that denials like yours didn’t hold up.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY