Bariatric Surgery Consultation denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 26 published external-review cases involving Bariatric Surgery Consultationand overturned the plan’s denial in 65.4%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
26
2004–2019
Overturned
65.4%
17 denials reversed

By condition

Published outcomes when Bariatric Surgery Consultation was denied for these conditions.
ConditionDecisionsOverturned
Obesity14
50%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 16 and 21 days

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

The patient is a 58-year-old male who has requested authorization for a bariatric surgery consultation. He is 6’1”, weighs 329 pounds, and has a body mass index (BMI) of 43.4. In addition, he has significant comorbid conditions. The Health Plan has denied authorization and coverage for the consultation with a bariatric surgeon based upon their determination that it is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition.With a BMI of 43 and comorbid conditions, the patient meets nationally accepted medical necessity criteria for consideration of weight loss surgery. It is highly likely that bariatric surgery will be beneficial for this patient. The fact that there is no documentation of medically supervised weight loss should not preclude a consultation for bariatric surgery.
Medical Necessity · 2006 · IMR MN06-5151
The patient is a 59-year-old female with a body mass index (BMI) of 52.4. She has multiple comorbidities including asthma and peripheral vascular disease. The patient has outlined failed attempts at weight loss with both supervised and unsupervised programs. She has requested authorization for a bariatric surgery consultation. The Health Plan has denied this request citing a lack of documented evidence the patient has participated in a medically supervised nutrition and exercise program.With a BMI of 52 and comorbid conditions, the patient meets nationally accepted medical necessity criteria for consideration of weight loss surgery. It is not likely that she will be able to lose weight and maintain the weight loss through non-surgical means.
Medical Necessity · 2005 · IMR MN05-4924

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for a consultation with a surgeon. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested service is not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis. A review of the records indicates that the enrollee has been diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis. The enrollee’s provider noted that the enrollee had been using a wheelchair. Knee pain was also noted. The enrollee was noted to have tried dieting but was unsuccessful with weight loss. The enrollee bariatric was 5 feet 7 inches tall, and weighed 323.3 pounds. The enrollee’s body mass index (BMI) was 50.62.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-30043
The patient is a 36 year-old female who is 5’3” tall weighing 280 pounds. Review of the submitted clinical information does not demonstrate that the patient has any life threatening comorbidities. The patient does have obesity related comorbidities that will improve with surgery. The submitted information indicates the patient continues to smoke. Evidence of a psychiatric evaluation has not been provided. The patient has requested that she receive a timelier consultation for bariatric surgery. The patient also indicates that she wishes to undergo duodenal switch gastric bypass rather than the Roux-en-Y procedure.A wait of six months for an appointment and up to a year before surgery is not uncommon and is consistent with many bariatric surgical programs.
Medical Necessity · 2004 · IMR MN04-3559

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving Bariatric Surgery Consultation, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied Bariatric Surgery Consultation? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $9