Home / Treatments / AIDS Wasting Tx

AIDS Wasting Tx denials: what the review data shows

Independent reviewers have decided 18 published cases where an insurer denied AIDS Wasting Tx — and they overturned the insurer 61.1% of the time. A denial for AIDS Wasting Tx is a starting position, not a final answer.

Published decisions
18
2001–2026
Overturned
61.1%
11 denials reversed

Conditions behind aids wasting tx denials

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
AIDS HIV18
61.1%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 8 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
27.8%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm
What the reviewers wrote
Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested Prezcobix for treatment of his human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Findings: The physician reviewer found that Prezcobix is a combination tablet that contains both (darunavir) Prezista and (cobicistat) Tybost. Numerous studies have shown that simplified regimens for HIV can increase adherence and thus long-term successful suppression of HIV replication and more successful treatment of disease leading to decreased morbidity and increased survival. Thus, the Health Plan’s denial of this beneficial simplification is detrimental to the patient’s health and survival. The standard of care dictates that the simplified regimen is better as it can increase adherence and long-term successful suppression of HIV.
Medical Necessity · 2015 · IMR MN15-21090
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for Serostim. Findings: The physician reviewer found that wasting, or cachexia, is a debilitating complication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Cachexia is associated with reduced strength and functional ability, as well as a decreased ability to withstand opportunistic infections. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Serostim, a recombinant human growth hormone for treatment of HIV-related cachexia. In addition, clinical studies support a role for Serostim in this clinical setting. The provider in this case noted that an alternative form of hormonal replacement with testosterone is not optimal for this patient, whose testosterone level is currently therapeutic.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-31019

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
The patient is a 54-year-old male who is HIV-infected and is being treated with appropriate anti-HIV therapy with good virological result. He has requested authorization and coverage for recombinant growth hormone (Serostim) for management of AIDs related wasting and weight loss. He reports that at 188 pounds he is more than 10% below his ideal weight of 220 pounds. He also states that his records include documentation of a normal serum testosterone while on testosterone therapy. There is a level of 125 ng/dL (low) in December 2005, and elevated levels in April and June 2005.At issue is whether Serostim is medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition.The patient does not meet medical necessity criteria for use of recombinant growth hormone.
Medical Necessity · 2006 · IMR MN06-5282
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for Serostim for treatment of the enrollee who has a history of human immunodeficiency virus. Findings: The physician reviewer found that There is a lack of support for the requested medication in this clinical setting. The current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for the medication Serostim in treatment of HIV patients who may be experiencing unintentional weight loss. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved this medication “for the treatment of HIV patients with wasting or cachexia to increase lean body mass and body weight, and improve physical endurance. Concomitant antiretroviral therapy is necessary.” In this patient’s case, depending on the formula used, this patient’s ideal body weight would be between 152 to 159 pounds. The patient’s weight was 160 pounds.
Medical Necessity · 2017 · IMR MN17-27199

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this treatment generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These are outcomes from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel that binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent process, and internal appeals succeed even more often. Cite the outcome record for AIDS Wasting Txwhen you appeal: reviewers routinely find that denials like yours didn’t hold up.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied AIDS Wasting Tx? 61.1% got it reversed.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39