Home / Conditions / Upper Respiratory Infection

Upper Respiratory Infection: when insurers say no, reviewers often say yes

In 16 published external-review decisions involving upper respiratory infection, independent physician reviewers overturned the insurer’s denial 31.3% of the time.

Published decisions
16
2001–2026
Overturned
31.3%
5 denials reversed

Most-fought treatments for upper respiratory infection

What insurers denied — and how those fights ended.
CategoryDecisionsOverturned
Emergency Room Visit6
16.7%
Emergency Department Visit3
66.7%
Typical time to a decision
21 days
Most land between 21 and 25 days
What the reviewers wrote
Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

A 57-year-old female has requested coverage for past emergency services. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the patient presented to the emergency department with chief complaint of productive cough, congestion, dizziness, slight fever, shortness of breath and runny nose of two days duration. She reports a prior history of underlying lung disease for which she was followed by a pulmonologist. Vital signs in the emergency department included heart rate 99, respirations 18, temperature 98.1 degrees and oxygen saturation 99% on room air. The patient reported a 7 out of 10 pain level. Upon initial presentation, the patient exhibited labored respirations, cough, and decreased breath sounds. A chest x-ray was normal.
Urgent Care · 2012 · IMR UR12-14482
A 33-year-old female has requested coverage for past emergency services. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the patient presented to the emergency department with chief complaint of severe left ear pain, fever, difficulty hearing out of the left ear and cough for 14 days. The emergency department triage records indicate the patient began experiencing a fever earlier that day and had severe pain as well as difficulty hearing out of her left ear. The patient reported her pain as a 9 on a scale of 1 to 10. The patient’s vital signs included temperature 99.9 degrees, pulse 90, respirations 16, and oxygen saturation 100% on room air. The patient was assessed with upper respiratory infection and otitis media left ear.
Urgent Care · 2012 · IMR UR12-14492

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
A 28-year-old female has requested coverage for past emergency services provided. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the patient presented to an urgent care facility complaining of a one-week history of a non-productive cough, hoarse voice and chest discomfort associated with a sore throat, nasal congestion and fever. No specifics regarding the severity of the patient’s symptoms were recorded in the medical records provided other than chest discomfort and a sore throat. The physical examination revealed normal vital signs and pulse oximetry, normal pharynx and normal lung sounds. No laboratory or x-ray testing was completed. The patient was diagnosed with an upper respiratory infection, with fever, cough and throat pain.
Urgent Care · 2012 · IMR UR12-13540
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested emergency room services provided on an emergent basis. Findings: The physician reviewer found that review of the submitted documentation demonstrates that a prudent layperson would not have sought immediate medical attention on the date in question. Upon review of the submitted medical records, the patient presented with upper respiratory symptoms with a fever. The patient denied any shortness of breath or vomiting. She was noted to be in no acute distress. Her temperature was elevated, which resolved with administration of oral acetaminophen. No radiologic studies or laboratory testing were performed. While parental concerns were noted over the patient’s persistent fever, the patient’s symptoms were not sudden or acute in onset.
Urgent Care · 2016 · IMR UR16-21319

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes come from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel whose decision binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent, and internal appeals succeed even more often. If your care for upper respiratory infection was denied, the published record says the denial is worth fighting.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Fighting a denial for upper respiratory infection? 31.3% won.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39