Pressure Ulcer denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 13 published external-review cases involving pressure ulcerand overturned the plan’s denial in 38.5%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Findings: The physician reviewer found that a patient has requested authorization and coverage for long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) level of care services. In this case, the record establishes that the patient has end-stage multiple sclerosis with associated severe mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) impairments and associated neurogenic bladder. The patient was admitted initially to the acute care hospital with acute onset of sepsis related to urinary tract infection and infection of pressure sores involving the sacrum and bilateral ischium. The patient was also noted as experiencing respiratory failure for which a tracheostomy was placed. The patient was later transferred from the ICU to the LTACH for multiple medical problems. The patient required treatment of severe pain and agitation with Precedex.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for skilled nursing facility (SNF) level of care. Findings: As noted in the medical literature, SNF admission may be indicated for patients with more than one wound, including a stage 3 pressure ulcer, rehabilitation, gait training, and observation. One study noted that, “Pressure ulcers (PUs) are injuries to the skin and underlying tissues that occur most commonly over bony prominences, such as the hips and heels as a result of pressure and shear forces.” Another study analyzed 477 patient records to determine the percentage of patients with pressure ulcers/injuries (PU/Is) who required admission to a SNF for wound care. The authors found that the majority of patients with a PU/I required admission from home to a SNF for appropriate care.
Where the denial was upheld
An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for in-patient acute level of care services.Irmak and colleagues state that, although reconstruction is still a controversial issue in elderly patients with advanced pressure ulcers, it has been established that infection, protein loss, morbidity, and mortality will increase in patients without proper debridement and reconstruction. Appropriate patient selection, debridement, and reconstruction with appropriate postoperative rehabilitation can be very beneficial in elderly patients. In patients whose general health condition is a contraindication for surgery, at a minimum, progression of pressure ulcers can be prevented with good wound care and conservative treatment.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services including physical therapy and occupational therapy services provided for treatment of the enrollee’s transient ischemic attack (TIA), epilepsy, and pressure ulcers. Findings: The physician reviewer found that based on the medical records provided for review, the SNF services including physical therapy and occupational therapy services provided were not and are not medically necessary for treatment of this patient’s medical condition. Patients require SNF services or skilled rehabilitation services when they are needed on a daily basis and the daily skilled services can be provided only on an inpatient basis in a SNF. The documentation does not reveal that this patient requires SNF services.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving pressure ulcer, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY