Plagiocephaly denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 34 published external-review cases involving plagiocephalyand overturned the plan’s denial in 61.8%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for cranial orthotic helmet. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested equipment is not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s abnormal head shape (plagiocephaly).Findings: There is scientific evidence demonstrating that the requested equipment is effective in this clinical setting. Positional plagiocephaly and deformational brachycephaly are broad terms used to encompass abnormal head shape due to a wide variety of etiologies. Prenatal causes include resting of the fetal head against a hard surface such as the mother’s pelvis or the limb of a sibling in a multiple gestation pregnancy for a prolonged period of time. Postnatal causes are more common and include congenital torticollis, vertebral anomalies, neurologic impairment, or forced sleep position.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient’s parent has requested reimbursement for a custom cranial remolding orthotic. Positional plagiocephaly and deformational brachycephaly are broad terms used to encompass abnormal head shape due to a wide variety of etiologies. Prenatal causes may include the resting of the fetal head against a hard surface, such as the mother’s pelvis or the limb of a sibling in a multiple gestation pregnancy, for a prolonged period, while postnatal causes are more common and may include congenital torticollis, vertebral anomalies, neurologic impairment, or forced sleep positions. Presentation ranges from mild or moderate cases, that may respond to mechanical adjustments and exercises, to severe cases that are refractory to repositioning and may require surgery for correction.
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient’s parent has requested reimbursement for cranial remolding orthosis.Findings: The physician reviewer found that Positional plagiocephaly and deformational brachycephaly are terms used to encompass abnormal head shape due to a wide variety of etiologies and can range from mild to severe. Patients with mild and moderate plagiocephaly or brachycephaly may respond to mechanical adjustments and exercises. However, some patients present with severe and refractory to repositioning. The current treatment for patients with mild head shape abnormalities includes repositioning, physical therapy, and increased time in the prone position. Most providers currently recommend cranial orthoses for infant patients with moderate to severe skull deformities.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient’s parent has requested reimbursement for DOC Band cranial remolding orthotic device. As noted in the records provided for review, this patient has a cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) of 6.2, cephalic index of 89.5, and a cranial vault asymmetry of 8 mm. Per the Plagiocephaly Severity Scale of the Children’s Hospital of Atlanta, the patient’s CVAI of 6.2 places him in the stage 2, mild range. The authors report that a CVAI of 3.5-6.25 with minimal asymmetry in one posterior quadrant and no secondary changes should be treated with a repositioning program. This patient is described as having right occipital flattening, left frontal flattening, anterior ear shift right, anterior orbital shift right and eye fissure narrowing left. This presentation includes some overlap with stage 3, moderate plagiocephaly.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving plagiocephaly, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY