Home / Conditions / Hip Fracture

Hip Fracture: when insurers say no, reviewers often say yes

In 16 published external-review decisions involving hip fracture, independent physician reviewers overturned the insurer’s denial 31.3% of the time.

Published decisions
16
2001–2026
Overturned
31.3%
5 denials reversed
Typical time to a decision
17 days
Most land between 3 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
37.5%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm
What the reviewers wrote
Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for in-home skilled nursing visits and in-home physical therapy services, twice a week. As noted in the medical literature, skilled nursing level of care is appropriate for patients with conditions that require observation, evaluation of treatment plans, and updating of orders by a physician, as well as constantly available skilled nursing services. Patients treated in home health skilled nursing care require skilled nursing services including wound management, tracheostomy care, bowel and bladder training and tube feeding, and administration of intravenous (IV) medications or medications that cannot be self-administered safely.
Medical Necessity · 2024 · IMR MN24-40898
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: A patient has requested authorization and coverage for treatment in an acute rehabilitation facility. This patient has a rehabilitation diagnosis of stroke. Her rehabilitation will most likely be complicated by her hip fracture. These two diagnoses require a higher level of rehabilitative care to help her progress in rehabilitation and decrease the likelihood of fall. A meta-analysis found that within the first 11.5 weeks after a stroke, patients with lower limitation in activities of daily living, higher functional independence, and better balance are more likely to have a higher quality of life one year after a stroke. These are modifiable risk factors and a clear argument for early acute rehabilitation, and this patient is in this timeframe window.
Medical Necessity · 2024 · IMR MN24-41797

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for aquatic therapy services consisting of 12 additional 30-minute sessions twice a week for six weeks. The records provided for review document that this patient is status post right hip hemiarthroplasty for a hip fracture after a fall in 2021. The provider noted that the patient has undergone extensive physical therapy. The patient has participated in aquatic therapy and she has been educated on a home exercise program. The patient has requested additional aquatic therapy services. As noted in the medical literature, exercise in an aquatic setting is one of several options for lower intensity exercise that can provide a more tolerable environment for exercise, as well as symptom relief for patients with various health conditions.
Medical Necessity · 2022 · IMR MN22-38109
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested reimbursement and prospective authorization and coverage for skilled nursing facility level of care provided for treatment of the enrollee, who sustained a hip fracture. Findings: The physician reviewer found that the submitted documentation fails to demonstrate the medical necessity of the services at issue. Hip fractures are conditions that are known to substantially affect functional performance, and negatively impact both short-term and long-term health-related quality of life. In this case, the patient also has a history of prior intracerebral bleed with residual cognitive impairment and left hemiparesis. She had impairments in her mobility at baseline, further complicating her convalescence.
Medical Necessity · 2016 · IMR MN16-24129

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes come from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel whose decision binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent, and internal appeals succeed even more often. If your care for hip fracture was denied, the published record says the denial is worth fighting.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Fighting a denial for hip fracture? 31.3% won.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39