Heterogeneously Dense Breasts: when insurers say no, reviewers often say yes
In 12 published external-review decisions involving heterogeneously dense breasts, independent physician reviewers overturned the insurer’s denial 100% of the time.
Most-fought treatments for heterogeneously dense breasts
| Category | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
| Digital Breast Tomosynthesis | 9 | 100% |
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammogram).The main weakness of mammography is the detection of cancer in women with radiographic dense breasts. While nearly all cancers will be apparent in fatty breasts, only half will be visible in extremely dense breasts. This is a result of the masking or camouflaging of non-calcified cancers by surrounding dense tissue. An advantage of tomosynthesis is better delineation and characterization of breast masses. The primary benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis would be expected to be for non-calcified mammographic findings, such as masses, asymmetries, and distortion. In the most basic application, digital breast tomosynthesis would allow visualization of cancers not apparent by conventional mammography, thus improving sensitivity.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested breast tomosynthesis for her breast examination. Findings: Three physician reviewers found that tomosynthesis is a technique that was developed several years ago as a problem solving adjunct to routine mammography. Applying the same basic concept as computed tomography (CT) scanning, the logic is that by separating the various layers of breast tissue, one can better detect abnormalities. This has been shown to be most useful in the evaluation of the dense breast. In this particular patient, she was noted to have heterogeneously dense breasts. The ability to separate out the overlapping structures enables the possibility of demonstrating an otherwise occult tumor. The medical literature supports the use of breast tomosynthesis over conventional mammogram due to improved cancer detection rate.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes come from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel whose decision binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent, and internal appeals succeed even more often. If your care for heterogeneously dense breasts was denied, the published record says the denial is worth fighting.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY