Failure To Thrive denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 13 published external-review cases involving failure to thriveand overturned the plan’s denial in 76.9%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/ Case Summary: The enrollee’s parent is requesting reimbursement for intensive tube weaning program services. The enrollee has diagnoses of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and Noonan’s syndrome. He was an oral eater until approximately three months of age. He breast-fed for the first four weeks of his life and transitioned to bottle feeding. His family observed loud breathing, frequent vomiting, and poor weight gain during this time. He was hospitalized at one and a half months for 10 days due to recurrent vomiting and failure to thrive. He underwent a supraglottoplasty for his laryngomalacia and tracheomalacia. He was hospitalized one month later for recurrent vomiting, chronic upper respiratory infections, and failure to thrive. A nasogastric (NG) tube was placed due to decreased weight gain, feeding refusal, and failure to thrive.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient’s parent has requested authorization and coverage for in-home private during nursing home services. Kuo and colleagues noted that the parents of medically complex children with special health care needs spend an average of nearly nine hours per day managing the patient’s basic healthcare needs, such as personal hygiene and feeding, administering drugs and managing symptoms, pain and sleep related problems during the night. Current data shows that the number of medical appliances and the status of single caregivers correlated proportionally with a greater amount of time needed for the patient’s care. It is important for patients’ families to receive appropriate support with daily care tailored to the patient’s individual needs.
Where the denial was upheld
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient’s parent has requested authorization and coverage for continued in-home private duty nursing services for 86 hours per week. Home based nursing services are essential for the parents of young patients with life-limiting or life-threatening diseases who spend an average of nearly nine hours per day managing the patient’s basic healthcare needs such as personal hygiene and feeding, administering drugs and managing symptoms like seizures, pain, and sleep related problems during the night. Current data shows that the number of medical appliances and the status of single caregivers correlated proportionally with a greater amount of time needed for the patient’s care. It is important for these families to receive appropriate support with daily care, through the evaluation of individual needs of the patient and organization of care models.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested Genotropin growth hormone (GH) therapy for treatment of the enrollee’s short stature. The physician reviewer found that this patient has failure to thrive and constitutional delay in association with a chronic inflammatory condition. Although his testing revealed a peak GH response of less than 10 ng/mL to provocative testing, such testing has poor specificity for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in a patient with delayed puberty who is also underweight. In addition, a low IGF-1 level in a patient who is underweight is not specific for GH deficiency. There is also a lack of biochemical evidence that this patient has other pituitary deficiencies to raise concern about a broader diagnosis of hypopituitarism.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving failure to thrive, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY