Degenerative Joint Disease denials in California external review

In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 20 published external-review cases involving degenerative joint diseaseand overturned the plan’s denial in 40%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.

California DMHC decisions
20
2002–2023
Overturned
40%
8 denials reversed
Typical time to a decision
17 days
Most land between 9 and 21 days
Handled as urgent
15%
Expedited when a delay would cause harm

What the reviewers wrote

Excerpts from the independent reviewers’ published findings — the actual reasoning, quoted, not summarised.

Where the denial was overturned

Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient requested authorization and coverage for methadone tablets with a quantity of 180 tablets every 30 days for chronic pain. Concerning this issue of whether clinicians should continue with opioid therapy for chronic pain, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that providers should carefully weigh the benefits and risks and exercise care when changing the opioid dosage. If the benefits outweigh the risks of continued opioid therapy, clinicians should work closely with patients to optimize nonopioid therapies while continuing opioid therapy.
Medical Necessity · 2023 · IMR MN23-39231
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has been diagnosed with synovial chondromatosis and degenerative joint disease. The patient reported left knee pain. The patient was noted to be status post open synovectomy for synovial chondromatosis. Physical examination findings included a mild left knee effusion and crepitation of the patellofemoral joint. An x-ray was noted to reveal significant synovial chondromatosis with joint space narrowing. A Celestone injection was administered to the left knee. The provider noted the Celestone injection did not provide the patient with pain relief. The patient has requested authorization and coverage for hyaluronan injections (CPT J7321) for the left knee. The Health Plan denied the request and reported that the requested services are not medically necessary for the treatment of this patient.
Medical Necessity · 2020 · IMR MN20-32923

Where the denial was upheld

Worth reading too — these show what an appeal has to overcome.
Findings: The physician reviewer found that Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient requested authorization and coverage for lumbar and neck epidural corticosteroid (steroid) injections and/or bilateral ankle arthroscopy and bilateral knee arthroscopy followed by rehabilitation and physical therapy (PT) services.Lumbar transforaminal injection of steroid (LTFIS) is a treatment for radicular pain. Steroids are believed to have a therapeutic effect due to their anti-inflammatory properties. Smith and colleagues concluded that there is strong evidence that lumbar transforaminal injection of steroids is an effective treatment for radicular pain due to disc herniation. The authors indicated that there is a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating their effectiveness in the treatment of radicular pain due to spinal stenosis.
Medical Necessity · 2023 · IMR MN23-40513
Nature of Statutory Criteria/ Case Summary: The enrollee requested authorization and coverage for arthroscopic surgery for the left knee. According to the medical record, the enrollee has a history of left knee pain, for which she had previous arthroscopic partial meniscus debridement. She presented for orthopedic evaluation as her left knee pain has been worsening. Orthopedic examination of the left knee showed pain, swelling, and decreased range of motion. The orthopedist diagnosed left knee osteoarthritis and degenerative joint disease. X-rays showed mild joint space narrowing. According to the medical literature, the majority of studies do not support the use of arthroscopic partial meniscus debridement (APM) with osteoarthritis, and even when there is no osteoarthritis.
Medical Necessity · 2019 · IMR MN19-31055

Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.

How to use this in your appeal

These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving degenerative joint disease, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Fighting a denial for degenerative joint disease? Use the California record to prepare.

Explain my denial — freeStart my appeal · $39