Chronic Fatigue Syndrome denials in California external review
In the California DMHC record, independent physician reviewers decided 26 published external-review cases involving chronic fatigue syndromeand overturned the plan’s denial in 11.5%. That is a historical result among cases that reached this program, not a forecast for an individual appeal.
What the insurer actually argued
| Reason given | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
Medical Necessity The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable. | 18 | 16.7% |
Experimental/Investigational The plan called the treatment unproven. These turn on published evidence, so the appeal is a literature argument. | 8 | 0% |
What the reviewers wrote
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient requested authorization and coverage for immune globulin therapy, Gammagard liquid 500 mg.Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), is a very difficult-to-diagnose disease. The most pronounced presentation is unexplained persistent severe fatigue. The authors of a study determined that there was a lower quality of life and a higher prevalence of fatigue among those with immunoglobulin subset deficiencies. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy has been tried in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and the consensus is that the therapy has resulted in significant benefit. Further, a recent study suggests that the benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin G (IV IgG) infusions to treat CFS/ME may have been underestimated.
The patient is a 53-year-old female with a history of chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, obstructive sleep apnea, arthritis, and chronic headaches. She has been tried on all anti-inflammatories, Risperdal, Zonegran, Prozac, and Diazepam without benefit. The patient’s current medication regimen includes Welbutrin, Effexor, Fiorinal, Ambien, Soma, and Nortriptyline. She continues to have fatigue and constant pain. The patient also is participating in a chronic fatigue group. Her primary care physician has recommended Provigil to help improve the patient’s energy. The Health Plan has denied authorization and coverage for Provigil on the basis it is not medically necessary for treatment of the patient’s medical condition. Based upon the submitted medical records, it does not appear the patient is currently responding to most of the medications that she has tried in the past.
Where the denial was upheld
Physician 1The patient is a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome attributed to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. The submitted information does not provide corroborating historical or serologic evidence supporting the infection. The patient has a 30-year history of arthritis without documented deformity or synovitis. She currently experiences diffuse body aches including all joints with 15 minutes of morning stiffness. In addition, the patient has photosensitivity, Raynaud’s and alopecia. Her exam apparently revealed four tender points with no evidence of inflammatory arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) features. She has a low normal C4 with negative ANA, Ro, La dsDNA, normal ESR and CBC with an elevated parvovirus B-19 IgG and negative IgM. The patient has been treated with NSAIDS, narcotic analgesics, and anxiolytics.
The enrollee is requesting authorization and coverage for the treatment plan by provider, to include the medications: Valtrex (valacyclovir) 500mg three (3) times daily, Abilify (aripiprazole) 1.5mg daily, low-dose naltrexone 4.5mg daily, and Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) 300mg daily. The enrollee has chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis/systemic exertion intolerance disease. She complains of profound fatigue, un-improved with bed rest and worsened by physical or mental activity. She has various non-specific symptoms, including weakness, muscle pain, impaired memory and/or mental concentration, insomnia, and post-exertional fatigue, lasting more than 24 hours. The enrollee has been on Valtrex, Plaquenil, Naltrexone, and Abilify.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California external-review outcomes. Other state and federal programs have different eligibility rules, processes, and current availability; the rates here do not transfer to those programs or predict an individual result. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes describe eligible cases completed through California DMHC’s Independent Medical Review program. They do not estimate the chance that an internal appeal, an external review in another jurisdiction, or your individual case will succeed. Use the record to identify evidence patterns involving chronic fatigue syndrome, then check the rights and deadlines that apply to your plan.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · AGGREGATES + DEIDENTIFIED DECISION EXCERPTS/REFERENCE IDS · METHODOLOGY