Acne Vulgaris: when insurers say no, reviewers often say yes
In 19 published external-review decisions involving acne vulgaris, independent physician reviewers overturned the insurer’s denial 63.2% of the time.
What the insurer actually argued
| Reason given | Decisions | Overturned |
|---|---|---|
Medical Necessity The plan said the care wasn’t medically necessary. The most common fight, and the most winnable. | 15 | 66.7% |
Experimental/Investigational The plan called the treatment unproven. These turn on published evidence, so the appeal is a literature argument. | 4 | 50% |
Where the denial was overturned
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested doxycycline hydrate (Oracea) for treatment of her acne. The physician reviewer found that acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder in adolescence and young adults. In the adult female, acne is a chronic condition with a substantial negative psychological, social and emotional impact. The morphological characteristics of adult female acne are often distinct from adolescent acne. Adult acne is mainly mild-to-moderate in severity and may be refractory to treatment. Doxycycline has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as adjunctive therapy in severe acne. In adult female acne, the creation of papules, pustules and nodules is mediated through immune mechanisms.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested doxycycline hydrate (Oracea) for treatment of her acne. The physician reviewer found that acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder in adolescence and young adults. In the adult female, acne is a chronic condition with a substantial negative psychological, social and emotional impact. The morphological characteristics of adult female acne are often distinct from adolescent acne. Adult acne is mainly mild-to-moderate in severity and may be refractory to treatment. Doxycycline has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as adjunctive therapy in severe acne. In adult female acne, the creation of papules, pustules and nodules is mediated through immune mechanisms.
Where the denial was upheld
Physician 1: The patient is a 44-year-old male with long-standing acne vulgaris. He has been treated with multiple medications, both topical and oral, with only limited improvement. The patient underwent several Blu-light phototherapy sessions, a light based technology, to clear his acne and is now requesting reimbursement for the cost of the therapy. The Health Plan denied reimbursement citing the investigational nature of Blu-light phototherapy.At this time, the light therapies are an unproven treatment approach and there is very limited data comparing their efficacy with “traditional” acne therapies. A review of available research identified only one study in which the investigator was sponsored by the light source company. To date, there is no compelling evidence that the light-based therapies are likely to result in superior treatment outcomes.
Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The parent of an enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for Onexton gel pump. The Health Plan has denied this request indicating that the requested medication is not medically necessary for treatment of the enrollee’s acne. A review of the record indicates that the enrollee has been diagnosed with acne. The medical records indicated the enrollee had acne present on the face, back, and chest. Papules, pustules, cysts, and erythema were noted. The enrollee was using Onexton gel and Retin-A. The enrollee’s provider has recommended Onexton gel pump for the enrollee.Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder in adolescence and young adults. In past decades, systemic antibiotics have had the main role in the treatment of acne patients with inflammatory papules and cysts.
Figures and quotations on this page come from 42,749 published decisions in the California DMHC Independent Medical Review dataset. These are California outcomes — every state runs an equivalent external review, but the rates here are California’s. Excerpts are quoted verbatim from the public record and describe this condition generally, not any individual case.
These outcomes come from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel whose decision binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent, and internal appeals succeed even more often. If your care for acne vulgaris was denied, the published record says the denial is worth fighting.
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY