Home / Treatments / Durable Medical Equipment

Durable Medical Equipment denials: what the review data shows

Independent reviewers have decided 2,679 published cases where an insurer denied durable medical equipment — and they overturned the insurer 44.6% of the time. If your denial is in this category, the odds say: appeal.

Published decisions
2,679
2001–2026
Overturned
44.6%
1,196 denials reversed

By denial reason

The excuse on the letter changes the odds — and the counter-strategy.
Denial reasonDecisionsOverturned
medical necessity1,976
44.6%
experimental / investigational703
44.7%

Within this category

Subcategories with at least 15 published decisions.
SubcategoryDecisionsOverturned
Other987
40.8%
Electric Wheelchair160
23.1%
Wheelchair141
27%
Orthotics133
69.2%
CPM Machine108
39.8%
Electric Scooter100
9%
Glucose Monitor100
76%
Prosthesis94
51.1%
Special Bed88
45.5%
Braces81
35.8%
Insulin Pump76
68.4%
C-Pap Machine66
56.1%
Cont Glucose Monitor62
88.7%
Compression Garments57
42.1%
Wearable Cardio Defib53
64.2%
Elect Bone Stim53
32.1%
Oxygen44
18.2%
Shoe Inserts38
68.4%
Pneumatic Vest33
48.5%
Special Chair27
63%
How to use this in your appeal

These are outcomes from California’s external review program — an independent physician panel that binds the insurer. Every state has an equivalent process, and internal appeals succeed even more often. Cite the category outcome when you appeal: reviewers routinely find that denials like yours didn’t hold up.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DMHC INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEW OUTCOMES (CHHS OPEN DATA) · DERIVED AGGREGATE STATISTICS ONLY · METHODOLOGY

Not legal or medical advice. Coverage Rights is a self-help tool that helps you prepare your own appeal. For advice about your specific situation, talk to a licensed attorney or your doctor.

Denied for durable medical equipment? 44.6% got it reversed.

Explain my denial — free